Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JOSE MARROQUIN, et al. v. MIGUEL CANALES, et al.

ORDER

CATHERINE BLAKE, District Judge

For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (docket entry no. 84) is Granted in part and Denied in part;

2. the plaintiffs are entitled to the sum of $47,585.50, before pre-judgment interest;

3. Jose Sales's motion for summary judgment (docket entry no. 85) is Granted;

4. Sales is entitled to the sum of $2,392.50, before pre-judgment interest;

5. URI's motion for summary judgment (docket entry no. 74) is Denied without prejudice;

6. the defendants' motion for partial summary judgment as to Alicia Canales (docket entry no. 83) is Granted; and

7. Counsel will be contacted to schedule a trial date.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARROQUIN v. CANALES
(Aug 8, 2007)