AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

DESHANDA CRUSSELL, as PLAINTIFF Next Friend and Custodial Parent of J.C., a Minor v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC. a Foreign Corporation DEFENDANT.

ORDER

HARRY BARNES, District Judge

Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted, (Doc. 9) filed on behalf of Defendant Electrolux Home Products, Inc. ("Electrolux"). Electrolux argues that Plaintiff Deshanda Crussell's claims — seeking recovery for negligent personal injury to her unborn child — are not recognized by the courts of Arkansas and should be dismissed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6). Electrolux also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment based on the purported failure of Plaintiff's cause of action. (Doc. 7-1). Plaintiff has responded to Electrolux's motions. (Docs. 26, 28). Electrolux has replied to Plaintiff's responses. (Docs. 34, 35). The Court held a hearing on the matter on April 5, 2007. (Doc. 44). For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion of even date, Electrolux's Motions to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief May Be Granted and for Summary Judgment should be and hereby are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CRUSSELL v. ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, INC. (W.D.Ark. 8-10-2007)
(Aug 10, 2007)