Ordered that the nonparty father's appeal from so much of the order as denied the mother's application to have the subject child returned to her custody and directed her to perform certain actions is dismissed, as he is not aggrieved by those portions of the order ( see CPLR 5511; Matter of Seasia D., 25 AD3d 607, 608); and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order as continued the temporary removal of the subject child from the care of the father is dismissed as academic; and it is further,
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeal from so much of the order as temporarily removed the subject child from the care of the father must be dismissed as academic because that part of the order has been superseded by an order paroling the subject child to the father ( see Matter of Desiree C, 7 AD3d 522, 523; Matter of C. Children, 249 AD2d 540; Matter of Keith C, 226 AD2d 369, 370).
We have reviewed the record and agree with the father's assigned counsel that there are no non-frivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted ( see Anders v California, 386 US 738; Matter of Dyshea T., 17 AD3d 685).