AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

WARREN D. PRICE Plaintiff, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION Defendant.

ORDER

RICHARD ARCARA, District Judge

This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Hugh B. Scott pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), on August 24, 2005. On December 29, 2006, defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. On April 19, 2007, Magistrate Judge Scott filed a Report and Recommendation, recommending that defendant's motion for summary judgment be granted.

Plaintiff filed objections to the Report and Recommendation on May 10, 2007 and defendant filed a response on June 6, 2007. Oral argument on the objections was held on July 27, 2007.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court must make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. Upon a de novo review of the Report and Recommendation, and after reviewing the submissions and hearing argument from the parties, the Court adopts the proposed findings of the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in Magistrate Judge Scott's Report and Recommendation, defendant's motion for summary judgment is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to take all steps necessary to close the case.

SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PRICE v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
(Aug 24, 2007)