AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

GIKLIN ARAUZ Plaintiff, v. RICKY BELL, WARDEN, et al. Defendants.

ORDER

ALETA TRAUGER, District Judge

The Court has before it defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Docket Entry No. 32), a Report and Recommendation (Docket Entry No. 55) from the Magistrate Judge urging that the motion be granted, plaintiff's timely objections (Docket Entry No. 56) to the Report and Recommendation, and the defendants' response (Docket Entry No. 59) to the plaintiff's objections.

The Court has reviewed these pleadings de novo and, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, finds that the plaintiff's objections lack merit. Therefore, the plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED AND APPROVED in all respects. The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Bell, Colson, Castile and Love (Docket No. 32) is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARAUZ v. BELL
(Aug 24, 2007)