Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JACOB BARRETT, Plaintiff, v. BRIAN BELLEQUE, A. BALES, RANDY GEER, JANE DOE (Mailroom Censor), and M. DODSON, Defendants.

ORDER

ANCER HAGGERTY, District Judge

Magistrate Judge Jelderks referred to this court a Findings and Recommendation in this action [42]. The Findings and Recommendation recommends that defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [27] be granted, and that plaintiffs Motions for Summary Judgment [18] and for a Preliminary Injunction [8] be denied.

The matter is now before this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). See also Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court, 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court has examined the pending motion and the underlying record. The Findings and Recommendation is, therefore, adopted. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [42] is granted, and plaintiff's Motions for Summary Judgment [18] and for a Preliminary Injunction [8] are denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BARRETT v. BELLEQUE
(Sep 4, 2007)