Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

LaCREAM NEWMAN, Plaintiff, v. GEORGE B. DUNCAN, Superintendent of Great Meadow Correctional Facility; DAVID CARPENTER, Deputy Superintendent; PATRICK VANGUILDER, Deputy Superintendent of Security; WILLIAM MAZZUCA, Superintendent of Fishkill Correctional Facility; R. ERCOLE, Deputy Superintendent of Security; J. CONKLIN, Corrections Sergeant; and JOHN DOE, Corrections Officer, Defendants.

DECISION ORDER

THOMAS McAVOY, District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

This pro se action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was referred to the Hon. David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, for a Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Local Rule 72.3(c). No objections to the Report-Recommendation and Order dated September 6, 2007 have been filed. Furthermore, after examining the record, this Court has determined that the Report-Recommendation and Order is not subject to attack for plain error or manifest injustice. Accordingly, the Court adopts the Report-Recommendation and Order for the reasons stated therein.

It is therefore,

ORDERED that

(1) Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 36) is GRANTED as to defendants Duncan, Carpenter, VanGuilder, Mazzuca, Ercole, and Conklin and as to all of Newman's causes of action;

(2) The complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice as to defendant John Doe; and

(3) This action is TERMINATED in its entirety as to all defendants and all claims.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NEWMAN v. DUNCAN
(Sep 26, 2007)