Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)

STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. COLE W. CONKLIN, Defendant-Appellant. STATE OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Respondent,

PER CURIAM

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; former disposition withdrawn. In A127226 and A127635, convictions for violation of former ORS 475.999(1) (2003) vacated and remanded for entry of convictions for violation of ORS 475.840, and for resentencing. In A127272, conviction for violation of former ORS 475.999(1) (2003) vacated and remanded for entry of conviction for violation of ORS 475.840, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

PER CURIAM

In these consolidated criminal cases, both parties jointly request reconsideration of our prior opinion, State v. Conklin, 214 Or App 80, 162 P3d 364 (2007), noting that our dispositional paragraph failed to order a remand for resentencing in two of the three consolidated cases involved in this appeal. We modify the disposition of the case as follows in order to correct that oversight:

Reconsideration allowed; former opinion modified and adhered to as modified; former disposition withdrawn. In A127226 and A127635, convictions for violation of former ORS 475.999(1) (2003) vacated and remanded for entry of convictions for violation of ORS 475.840, and for resentencing. In A127272, conviction for violation of former ORS 475.999(1) (2003) vacated and remanded for entry of conviction for violation of ORS 475.840, and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

STATE v. CONKLIN
(Sep 26, 2007)