Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

Lawrence Heath, Plaintiff, v. Maricopa County, a municipality, and Joseph Arpaio and A

ORDER

JAMES TEILBORG, District Judge

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing, all of Plaintiff's remaining claims (those that were scheduled to be tried on October 23, 2007) are dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees with respect to the claims dismissed by this Order.

It is further ordered that Plaintiff will not seek to reinstitute or pursue in any way the claims dismissed by this Order. Accordingly, this Order is a final judgment.

It is further ordered that because this Order is a final judgment, Plaintiff may now pursue any and all appeal rights Plaintiff may have as to those claims earlier dismissed as reflected in the Court's Summary Judgment Order (Doc. #44).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

HEATH v. MARICOPA COUNTY
(Oct 1, 2007)