Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

EDDIE RUSHING, Plaintiff, v. C/O JIMMY W. HOLLEN, C/O MICHAEL L. HOUSTON, C/O DANNY R. STOUT, SGT. FRANK FAIRLESS, and CHRIS BROOKS, Defendants.

ORDER

DAVID HERNDON, District Judge

Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss (Doc. 39), filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), seeking a Court Order of dismissal without prejudice of the remaining Defendants in this matter. A Response (Doc. 40) was filed by defendants Hollen, Houston, Stout and Fairless, stating they had no objection to the dismissal without prejudice. There was no response filed by defendant Brooks, yet as the time to respond is now past, silence will be construed as having no opposition.

Plaintiff's Motion (Doc. 39) is GRANTED. Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2), this matter is hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

RUSHING v. HOLLEN
(Oct 1, 2007)