AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

MAURICE PATRICK, Plaintiff, v. WILLIAMS AND ASSOCIATES, Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

FRED VAN SICKLE, District Judge

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Ct. Rec. 25. The Plaintiff is proceeding pro se. The Defendant is represented by J. Scott Miller. The Court being fully advised,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Ct. Rec. 25, is GRANTED. A supplemental order setting forth the basis for this ruling is forthcoming.

2. The Defendant's Motion to Continue Trial Date, Ct. Rec. 35, is DENIED AS MOOT.

3. The hearing on the Defendant's Motion To Continue Trial Date, Ct. Rec. 35, set for October 10, 2007 at 11:00 a.m. is STRICKEN.

4. The Defendant's Motion to Shorten Time, Ct. Rec. 38, is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. The District Court Executive is hereby directed to enter this order and furnish copies to counsel.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PATRICK v. WILLIAMS ASSOCIATES
(Oct 9, 2007)