Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges

JOHN EARL JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. JOSEPH GUIFFERE and JOHN PECORA, Administrator, Defendants.

ORDER

DAVID HURD, District Judge

Plaintiff, John Earl Johnson, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In a Report Recommendation dated August 10, 2007, the Honorable David E. Peebles, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that the defendant Sergeant Guiffere's motion for summary judgment be granted and the plaintiff's complaint be dismissed in all respects, with prejudice regarding defendant Guiffere, but without prejudice as to defendant Pecora. Objections to the Report Recommendation have been filed by the plaintiff.

Based upon a de novo review of the portions of the Report-Recommendation to which the plaintiff has objected, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted. See 28U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. The defendant Sergeant Guiffere's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

2. The complaint is DISMISSED in all respects, with prejudice with regard to defendant Guiffere;

3. The complaint is DISMISSED in all respects, without prejudice as to defendant Pecora; and

4. The Clerk shall file judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHNSON v. GUIFFERE
(Oct 17, 2007)