AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

ARTHUR R. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF GREENSBORO, Defendant.

ORDER

WILLIAM OSTEEN SR., District Judge

The Plaintiff, Arthur R. Armstrong, has paid a filing fee and filed this action against the City of Greensboro. As required by the amended injunction order of February 6, 2001 (1:97CV1028,Armstrong v. Koury Corp.), the Clerk has delivered the complaint to this court for determination of whether to allow the action to continue.

For the reasons set forth in a myriad of prior orders issued by this court, see, e.g., Armstrong v. City of Greensboro, 1:01CV810, this action is dismissed as an attempt to relitigate matters which have been previously dismissed. Even if it were not an attempt to resurrect a matter previously dismissed, this filing is insufficient to state a cause of action.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this proceeding should be and is hereby dismissed upon the court's own motion.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

ARMSTRONG v. CITY OF GREENSBORO
(Oct 16, 2007)