AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAIR LIPSCOMBE, Appellant.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion and the papers filed in relation thereto, it is

Ordered that the motion is granted and the application by assigned counsel is deemed withdrawn, and upon reargument, the decision and order of this Court dated October 23, 2007 ( see People v Lipscombe, 44 AD3d 967), is recalled and vacated, and the following decision and order is substituted therefor:

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Del Giudice, J.), rendered March 21, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the plea is vacated, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings in accordance herewith.

At the plea proceeding, the defendant was not advised that he would be subject to a period of post-release supervision as part of an enhanced sentence if he failed to comply with the conditions of his plea. After the defendant failed to appear on the scheduled sentencing date, the Supreme Court imposed the maximum sentence plus three years' post-release supervision. As the People correctly concede, the failure to advise the defendant of post-release supervision at the time of his plea requires reversal of his conviction ( see People v Louree, 8 NY3d 541; People v Pagan, 43 AD3d 1086).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. LIPSCOMBE
(Oct 23, 2007)