Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

In re DUANE V. BALDWIN TRUST, THOMAS M. SHOAFF, Petitioner-Appellant, v. THOMAS E. WOODS, Trustee, Respondent-Appellee, and THOMAS E. WOODS, Indi

Summary Dispositions October 24, 2007:

Pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals but we reject the reasoning of the Court of Appeals majority to the extent it is inconsistent with the partially dissenting opinion. Under the facts of this case, which the probate judge viewed in the light most favorable to the petitioner, even if the respondent owed a duty to the petitioner, the probate judge did not err in granting summary disposition to the respondent in both the estate proceeding and the trust proceeding, because there was no evidence of wrongdoing by the respondent. The petitioner received ample opportunity to set forth a genuine issue of material fact. MCR 2.116(I)(1).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE BALDWIN TRUST
(Oct 24, 2007)