MARLO v. UNITED PARCEL

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

No. 05-56446.

Advocates

John A. Furutani, Esq., Furutani Peters, LLP, G. Scott Emblidge, Esq., Rachel Sater, Esq., Moscone, Emblidge Quadra, LLP, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant. George W. Abele, Esq., Paul Hastings Janofsky Walker, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Judges

Alex Kozinski
M. Margaret McKeown

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

Michael MARLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Michael Mario appeals the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of United Parcel Service ("UPS") on his claim that UPS misclassified its Full-Time Supervisors ("FTS") as non-exempt employees. Summary judgment is appropriate where, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, there is no genuine issue of material fact. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986). Mario has raised material issues of fact related to whether the FTS "customarily and regularly exercise[] discretion and independent judgment." Cal. Code Regs. tit. 8, § 11090(1)(A)(1)(d) (2005). Accordingly, summary judgment as to that issue was improper.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Michael MARLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

Comments