BLOUNT v. WILLIAMS

Citation Codes

Equivalent Citations

citation codes

Docket Number

Nos. 07-6535, 07-6777.

Attorney(S)

Donell J. Blount, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., Guynn, Memmer Dillon, PC, Roanoke, Virginia; Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Judges

Paul Victor Niemeyer
M. Blane Michael
Allyson Kay Duncan

Acts

The Public Health And Welfare — Civil Rights — Generally — Civil Action For Deprivation Of Rights

See more information ...

Smart Summary

Please sign up to generate summary.

Donell J. BLOUNT, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Doctor WILLIAMS; D. Yates, R.N.; P. Adams, L.P.N.; C. More, L.P.N.; V. Phipps; Lieutenant Mullins; Sergeant Day; Lieutenant Rose; Corporal McClean; Corporal Fields; R. Mullins; Corporal Lyall; Corporal Baker; Lieutenant Turner; J. Armentrout; Sergeant Tate; Corporal Lawson; Corporal Boyd; Corporal Jeremy Fleming; Corrections Officer Smith; Corrections Officer Ratliff; Sergeant O'Quinn; Officer Foster; Officer Pennington; J. Fleming; Lieutenant S. Mullins; S. Boyd; M. McClellan, Defendants- Appellees, and Corporal Owens; Corporal Tomkins; Corporal Kennedy; Corporal Lee; Sergeant Mullins; Warden T. Ray; Doctor Bailey, Dentist; Y. Taylor; R.N. Roberts; Corporal Edward; Corporal Taylor; Corporal Buchanan; Sergeant Phillips; Corporal Greg Boyd; Corporal Lambert; Gene M. Johnson; Jane Doe; John Doe, Defendants. Donell J. Blount, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated appeals, Donell J. Blount, Sr., appeals the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaints. We have reviewed the records and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated by the district court. See Blount v. Williams, No. 7:05-cv-00556-GEC (W.D.Va. filed Mar. 23, 2007 entered Mar. 26, 2007); Blount v. Gentry, No. 7:06-cv-00312, 2007 WL 1310163 (W.D.Va. filed May 2, 2007 entered May 3, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Comments