Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Attorney(S)
Judges

JABBAR WITHROW, Plaintiff, v. J. TAYLOR, Superintendent, Gou

DECISION and ORDER

DAVID HURD, District Judge

Plaintiff, Jabbar Withrow, brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By Report-Recommendation dated September 28, 2007, the Honorable Gustave J. DiBianco, United States Magistrate Judge, recommended that defendants' motion for summary judgment be granted and the amended complaint be dismissed as against defendants Bango, Liberty, Taylor, and Geddis; that the amended complaint be dismissed as against defendant Rahim for failure to timely serve and for failure to timely substitute his estate pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) 25; and that the complaint be dismissed in its entirety. No objections to the Report-Recommendation have been filed.

Based upon a careful review of the entire file and the recommendations of Magistrate Judge DiBianco, the Report-Recommendation is accepted and adopted in all respects.See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1).

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED;

2. The amended complaint is DISMISSED as against defendants Bango, Liberty, J. Taylor, and Geddis;

3. The amended complaint is DISMISSED as against defendant Rahim; and

4. The complaint is DISMISSED in its entirety.

The Clerk is directed to enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WITHROW v. TAYLOR
(Nov 5, 2007)