AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

HERMENEGILDO CARINO et al., Appellants-Respondents, v. WEBSTER PLACE ASSOCIATES, LP, et al., Respondents-Appellants.

Plaintiff was entitled to partial summary judgment on his Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action, where he was injured when he fell from a ladder while in the course of removing an eight-foot-high fence at a construction site. Regardless of the method employed by plaintiff to remove the fence, the ladder provided to him was not an adequate safety device for the task he was performing and was a proximate cause of the fall and resulting injuries ( see Ben Gui Zhu v Great Riv. Holding, LLC, 16 AD3d 185; Dunn v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 272 AD2d 129).

Dismissal of the Labor Law § 200 cause of action was warranted since there is no evidence that defendants exercised supervision or control over plaintiffs work ( see Comes v New York State Elec. Gas Corp., 82 NY2d 876; Dalanna v City of New York, 308 AD2d 400).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARINO v. WEBSTER PLACE
(Nov 13, 2007)