AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of the Claim of FRANKLIN A. REYNA-BAUTISTA, Appellant. COMMISSIONER OF LABOR, Respondent.

Claimant worked as a car attendant at a parking garage for approximately 18 months. During a heated argument with a coworker, he displayed a knife. His supervisor witnessed the incident and discharged him as a result. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board later ruled that he was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct. Claimant appeals.

We affirm. Violent or threatening behavior in the workplace constitutes misconduct disqualifying a claimant from receiving unemployment insurance benefits ( see Matter of Moss [Commissioner of Labor], 39 AD3d 1057, 1057-1058; Matter of Eisenstadt [Commissioner of Labor], 10 AD3d 764, 765). Here, both claimant's supervisor and the coworker involved in the incident testified that claimant displayed a knife in a threatening manner during the confrontation. Claimant's contrary testimony presented a credibility issue for the Board to resolve ( see Matter of Mulea [Commissioner of Labor], 23 AD3d 753, 754). Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the Board's decision.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE REYNA-BAUTISTA
(Nov 15, 2007)