AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CARLOS COLON, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contentions that the prosecutor's remarks during summation constituted reversible error are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05; People v Doran, 27 AD3d 480; People v White, 5 AD3d 511). In any event, the contentions are without merit. The prosecutor's comments during summation that are alleged to be prejudicial were either fair comment upon the evidence or a fair response to arguments presented in summation by defense counsel, or constituted harmless error ( see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 241-242; People v Prince, 36 AD3d 833, 834; People v Urena, 24 AD3d 693; People v Meyers, 13 AD3d 395).

The defendant's remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. COLON
(Nov 20, 2007)