The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. There was ample evidence that the police officer sustained a physical injury ( see Penal Law § 10.00; People v Guidice, 83 NY2d 630, 636; People v Chiddick, 8 NY3d 445), including the officer's testimony that he was cut and bleeding, was in pain, required stitches, suffered from increased migraines, and was absent from work for several days as a result of the incident.