AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JAIME MONTOYA, Appellant.

The court's determination was an appropriate exercise of discretion. The record shows defendant was a high-level participant in an international narcotics distribution ring, who personally dealt with large amounts of drugs and money, and was apprehended in possession of 50 kilograms of cocaine. Given these facts, the court properly concluded that "substantial justice" dictated denial of resentencing ( see e.g. People v Salcedo, 40 AD3d 356, lv dismissed 9 NY3d 850; People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400, lv denied 7 NY3d 867).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. MONTOYA
(Nov 29, 2007)