Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not err in denying his request for a justification charge, as no reasonable view of the evidence supported the charge ( see People v Ojar, 38 AD3d 684; People v Brown, 33 AD3d 1016).
The imposition of consecutive sentences was not illegal ( see People v Salcedo, 92 NY2d 1019; People v James, 271 AD2d 456).