AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

DAVID KENDRICK, Plaintiff, v. THE HERTZ CORPORATION, Defendant.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL

GEORGE CANNON JR., Magistrate Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court upon the parties' Joint Stipulation Regarding Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant to Provide Responses to Discovery (Docket No. 54). Defendant's opposition to the said motion to compel was based upon its pending motion for stay of discovery. The record reflects that Defendant's said motion for stay was denied by order (Docket No. 59), entered October 23, 2006.

Accordingly, it is now hereby ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendant to Provide Responses to Discovery is GRANTED.
2. Defendant shall serve upon counsel for Plaintiff, within twenty (20) days from the date of entry of this order, its responses to interrogatories and demand for production of documents propounded by Plaintiff.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

KENDRICK v. HERTZ CORPORATION
(Dec 4, 2007)