Petitioner failed to produce a urine specimen within the three-hour time period allotted after being instructed to do so by a correction officer. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order and failing to comply with urinalysis testing procedures. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charges, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Levy v Goord, 22 AD3d 929). While petitioner maintained that he suffered from a medical condition that rendered him incapable of producing a specimen, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve ( see id. at 929-930) and, in any event, was not substantiated by the medical testimony given at the hearing. Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.