Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
An attorney may be permitted to withdraw from employment where a client refuses to pay reasonable legal fees ( see Winters v Winters, 25 AD3d 601, 602; Kay v Kay, 245 AD2d 549, 550; Stephen Eldridge Realty Corp. v Green, 174 AD2d 564, 565). Here, the record establishes that the plaintiffs were almost $3,000 in arrears in payment of their legal fees, which they had promised to pay within 10 days of billing pursuant to a retainer agreement. Moreover, the plaintiffs accused their attorney of incompetence and did not dispute that he no longer maintains an office in New York. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion, inter alia, for leave to withdraw as the plaintiffs' counsel see Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-110 [c] [1] [d], [f] [ 22 NYCRR 1200.15 (c) (1) (iv), (vi)]; Code of Professional Responsibility DR 2-110 [c] [6] [ 22 NYCRR 1200.15 (c) (6)]; Galvano v Galvano, 193 AD2d 779, 780).
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions either are without merit or have been rendered academic by our determination.