AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. CHARLES DOUGLAS, Appellant.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

By pleading guilty, the defendant forfeited his right to claim that he was deprived of a speedy trial under CPL 30.30 ( see People v O'Brien, 56 NY2d 1009, 1010). He could not validly reserve his right to obtain appellate review of his statutory speedy trial claim merely by obtaining the consent of the prosecutor and the approval of the court at the time his plea was entered ( id.). The defendant's contention that his plea was involuntary is not preserved for appellate review since the defendant failed to move to withdraw his plea on this ground ( see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 665; People v Cosby, 31 AD3d 660). In any event, his contention is without merit.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

PEOPLE v. DOUGLAS
(Dec 11, 2007)