AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of ROBERT MORETTI, Petitioner, v. DONALD SELSKY, as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs, Respondent.

Petitioner, an inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with violating the prison disciplinary rule prohibiting illicit drug use. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, he was found guilty as charged. Upon administrative review, the determination was affirmed with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Substantial evidence consisting of the misbehavior report, positive urinalysis test results and related documentation and testimony adduced at the hearing supports the determination of guilt ( see Matter of Crosby v Goord, 38 AD3d 1110; Matter of Hoover v Goord, 38 AD3d 1069, 1070, lv denied 8 NY3d 816). As for petitioner's assertion that he was deprived of adequate employee assistance, any defects in the assistance provided to him were cured by the Hearing Officer at the time of the hearing ( see Matter of Ellison v Goord, 274 AD2d 800, 801). We have reviewed petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that he was improperly denied the right to present evidence, there were deficiencies in the chain of custody and the Hearing Officer was biased, and find them to be unavailing.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MORETTI v. SELSKY
(Dec 13, 2007)