Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Kurt G. SCHLEGEL, Assignee of Piedmont Building and De v. lopment Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,

PER CURIAM:

Kurt G. Schlegel appeals the district court's orders dismissing his civil conspiracy complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Schlegel v. Bank of America, NA, 505 F.Supp.2d 321 (W.D.Va. 2007); No. 3:07-cv-00022-nkm, 2007 WL 2126358 (July 23, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SCHLEGEL v. BANK
(Dec 17, 2007)