Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jeffrey Dwayne ROACH, Defendant-Appellant.

PER CURIAM.

Following the district court's entry of an order that revoked the defendant's supervised release and imposed an eight-month sentence and a new three-year period of supervised release, Jeffrey Roach appealed on the basis of a purported double jeopardy violation and an alleged error in sentencing under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(h). However, at oral argument it was brought to our attention by counsel for the government that the defendant has completed serving his sentence and that the district court has vacated the order of supervised release in this case, upon entry of a second revocation of supervised release. As a result, the appeal in this case has been rendered moot.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. ROACH
(Dec 18, 2007)