Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

Lawrence Eugene MARTIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Superior Court Judge FOSTER, Respondent-Appellee.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

To the extent a certificate of appealability is necessary for this appeal, the request for a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

To the extent a certificate of appealability is not necessary for this appeal, we sua sponte grant appellant in forma pauperis status for this appeal. The Clerk shall change the docket to reflect appellant forma pauperis status.

A review of the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so in-substantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.

AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

MARTIN v. FOSTER
(Jan 2, 2008)