Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes

MARVIS BOWNES, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL REAGAN, District Judge

In this civil proceeding, Marvis Bownes challenged a sentence imposed by the undersigned District Judge in one of two criminal prosecutions in this District (Case No. 03-cr-30097). The undersigned Judge rejected Bownes' challenge and denied his motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on October 26, 2007. Judgment was entered accordingly four days later.

On December 26, 2007, Bownes appealed this Court's denial of § 2255 relief. By accompanying motion filed here December 27, 2007, Bownes requests a certificate of appealability.

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) provides that an appeal from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding may not be taken unless a Circuit or District Court Judge has issued a certificate of appealability. For the reasons stated in the October 26, 2007 Order, this Court concludes that Bownes has not made "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Accordingly, the Court DENIES Bownes' motion for certificate of appealability (Doc. 26).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BOWNES v. U.S
(Jan 2, 2008)