AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JOHN F. SIMONTACCHI, Plaintiff, v. INVENSYS, INC., Defendant.

ORDER

MARTIN REIDINGER, District Judge

THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Plaintiff's motion to consider matters outside the administrative record with regard to Plaintiff's ERISA claim. The motion is opposed.

After reviewing the Motion, the Response thereto and the record in this matter, the Court concludes that the Defendant's position is well taken. The evidence that Plaintiff seeks to submit in supplement to the record does not meet the standard for "exceptional circumstances" under Quesinberry v. Life Ins. Co. of North America, 987 F.2d 1017 (4th Cir. 1993). IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motion to consider evidence outside of the administrative record regarding Plaintiff's ERISA claim is hereby DENIED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

SIMONTACCHI v. INVENSYS, INC. (W.D.N.C. 1-11-2008)
(Jan 11, 2008)