Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
Where issues of credibility are presented, the factual determinations of a hearing court are afforded great weight on appeal and will not be disturbed if warranted by the record ( see Matter of Spillman v Spillman, 40 AD3d 770; McKiernan v McKiernan, 274 AD2d 560; see generally Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc., v Town of Bedford, 60 NY2d 492, 499).
The record supports the Supreme Court's determination that the husband violated an order of protection by going to the home of a mutual acquaintance of the parties, and looking for the wife while armed with an unsheathed machete only two days after being denied visitation with the parties' son ( cf. Matter of Sarmuksnis v Priest, 21 AD3d 381; Matter of Louvaris v Louuaris, 209 AD2d 524; Matter of Lentino v Lentino, 185 AD2d 849).
The husband's remaining contentions are without merit.