AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

PAUL NARKIN, Plaintiff, v. MARILYN LOGSDON, ROBERT LOGSDON, and THOMAS HOARD, Defendants.

ORDER

JOHN BAILEY, District Judge

On this day, the above-styled matter came before the Court for consideration of the plaintiff's Motion for a Request for an Attorney to Represent the Plaintiff [Doc. No. 14] and plaintiff's Motion for a Continuance [Doc. No. 15]. Plaintiff moves to have an attorney appointed to represent him pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and plaintiff also moves for more time to respond to the Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 10] filed by defendant, Joseph France.

Upon review of the above, the Court does not find sufficient grounds to support the Motions. Accordingly, the Motion for a Request for an Attorney to Represent the Plaintiff is DENIED, and the Motion for a Continuance [Doc. No. 15] is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to transmit copies of this Order to all counsel of record herein and the pro se plaintiff.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

NARKIN v. LOGSDON
(Feb 1, 2008)