Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ELIAZAR ANGUIANO-LOZANO, Defendant.

ORDER

THOMAS THALKEN, Magistrate Judge

This matter is before the court on the motion to continue by defendant Eliazar Anguiano-Lozano (Anguiano-Lozano) (Filing No. 33). Anguiano-Lozano seeks a continuance of the trial of this matter which is scheduled for February 11, 2008. Anguiano-Lozano's counsel represents that counsel for the government has no objection to the motion. Anguiano-Lozano has submitted an affidavit wherein he represents that he consents to the motion and acknowledges he understands the additional time may be excludable time for the purposes of the Speedy Trial Act (Filing No. 34). Upon consideration, the motion will be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. Anguiano-Lozano's motion to continue trial (Filing No. 33) is granted.

2. Trial of this matter is re-scheduled for May 19, 2008, before Chief Judge Joseph F. Bataillon and a jury. The ends of justice have been served by granting such motion and outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. The additional time arising as a result of the granting of the motion, i.e., the time between February 1, 2008 and May 19, 2008, shall be deemed excludable time in any computation of time under the requirement of the Speedy Trial Act for the reason that defendant's counsel requires additional time to adequately prepare the case. The failure to grant additional time might result in a miscarriage of justice. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) (B).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

U.S. v. ANGUIANO-LOZANO
(Feb 1, 2008)