Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not err in granting the prosecutor's challenge for cause to a prospective juror ( see People v Rennie, 34 AD3d 504; cf. People v Oliveri, 29 AD3d 330).
The defendant's challenges to allegedly prejudicial comments made by the prosecutor on summation and allegedly prejudicial questions on the defendant's cross-examination are unpreserved for appellate review ( see CPL 470.05). In any event, the comments and questions complained of do not warrant reversal ( see People v Wright, 40 AD3d 1021; People v Liu, 104 AD2d 1052).
The defendant's remaining contention is without merit.