Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress lineup identification evidence ( see People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335, cert denied 498 US 833; People v Arroyo, 38 AD3d 792, 793). Contrary to the defendant's contention, he was not the only one in the lineup wearing a black T-shirt. Moreover, the defendant's clothing did not figure prominently in the complainant's description of him, and there was no testimony adduced at the Wade hearing ( see United States v Wade, 388 US 218) that the complainant relied on clothing in identifying the defendant in the lineup ( see People v Tinnen, 238 AD2d 615, 616).
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution ( see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant's guilt of robbery in the third degree beyond a reasonable doubt ( see People v Andolina, 23 AD3d 573; People v Cannon, 1 AD3d 606; People v Brown, 309 AD2d 871).