Ordered that the decree is affirmed, with costs.
The power of attorney executed by the decedent did not authorize the attorney-in-fact to make gifts. Accordingly, the gratuitous conveyances of the decedent's properties by the attorney-in-fact to her mother were in violation of the fiduciary duty she owed to the decedent, and were therefore invalid ( see Matter of Agrest, 279 AD2d 471). Moreover, we agree with the Surrogate that the evidence wholly failed to establish that the decedent intended to gift the properties in question to the mother of the attorney-in-fact ( see Salonen v Salonen, 8 AD3d 255).
The appellant's remaining contentions are without merit.