AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

RICHARD CASTLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC., d/b/a/WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL AND WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL ACCEPTANCE, and DOES 1-50, Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' RENEWED NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge

Plaintiffs have filed a motion to amend the complaint, seeking to add plaintiffs who never signed arbitration agreements and to expand the putative class to include "senior credit managers" and "loan processors." The Court GRANTS the motion in part. Plaintiffs may add plaintiffs who did not sign arbitration agreements. However, in light of the Court's denial of plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification, plaintiffs' request to expand the putative class is DENIED as moot. (Docket No. 183). Plaintiffs' second amended complaint must be filed by February 29, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CASTLE v. WELLS FARGO FINANCIAL, INC. (N.D.Cal. 2-20-2008)
(Feb 20, 2008)