Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

REGIONS BANK d/b/a Regions Funding, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WIEDER MASTROIANNI, P.C. and Peter Mastroianni, Defendants-Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellees, Pro

SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Regions Bank appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Conner, J.), granting summary judgment in favor of defendant Wieder Mastroianni on Regions Bank's claim of conversion. On November 1, 2007, 253 Fed.Appx. 52, this panel remanded to the district court, under United States v. Jacobson, 15 F.3d 19, 22 (2d Cir. 1994), for clarification whether the district court's judgment had been based on Ohio law, and, if so, whether it would reach the same result applying New York law to the question of Wieder Mastroianni's liability for conversion. Regions Bank v. Wieder Mastroianni P.C., 253 Fed.Appx. 52 (2d Cir. 2007). On remand, in an opinion and order dated November 26, 2007, 526 F.Supp.2d 411, the district court made clear that, under New York law, summary judgment must be granted in favor of Wieder Mastroianni. Regions Bank v. Wieder Mastroianni P.C., 526 F.Supp.2d 411 (S.D.N.Y. 2007).

For the reasons stated by the district court on remand, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

REGIONS BANK v. WIEDER
(Feb 29, 2008)