AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

MOISES JIMENEZ CARDOZO, Appellant v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Moises Jimenez Cardozo waived a jury and pleaded guilty to unlawful possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine in an amount more than 400 grams. See Tex. Health Safety Code Ann. § 481.112(a), (f) (Vernon 2003). The trial court assessed punishment at twenty years' imprisonment and a $1500 fine.

Appellant's attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 811 (Tex.Crim.App. [Panel Op.] 1978). Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response, but he did not file a pro se response.

We have reviewed the record and counsel's brief. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824 (Tex.Crim.App. 2005). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

We affirm the trial court's judgment.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

CARDOZO v. STATE, 05-06-01263-CR (Tex.App.-Dallas [5th Dist.] 2-29-2008)
(Feb 29, 2008)