AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number

IN RE ROBERT C. KARLSENG, KARLSENG LAW FIRM, P.C.; ASHLEY BRIGHAM PATTEN; PATTEN KARLSENG LAW FIRM, P.C.; JACQUES YVES LEBLANC; AND LEBLANC, PATTEN AND KARLSENG LAW FIRM, P.C., Relators.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MARTIN RICHTER, Justice.

In this petition for writ of mandamus, relators complain that the trial court has erred in denying their motion for continuance. Relators have failed to comply with the requirements for filing a petition for extraordinary writ and they have not shown that they are entitled to the relief requested. See Tex. R. App. P.52.3 and 52.7(a). Accordingly, relators' petition for writ of mandamus is DENIED. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8 (a).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

IN RE KARLSENG, 05-08-00228-CV (Tex.App.-Dallas 3-3-2008)
(Mar 3, 2008)