Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

CARL E. BUTLER, Plaintiff, v. SARAHA LEE SMITH and LENNIE DARDEN, Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

G. SMITH, Magistrate Judge

On January 22, 2008, this Court entered an order requiring plaintiff to show good cause for failing to serve the defendants. (Doc. 6.) The Court afforded plaintiff ten days to comply with its order and warned him that if he failed to respond he risked dismissal for failure to effect timely service. (Id.) Well over ten days have passed and plaintiff has failed to submit the above information or any other documents in response to the Court's order. Accordingly, his complaint should be DISMISSED without prejudice for his failure to prosecute this action. Local Rule 41.1(b) (permitting dismissal for willful disobedience or neglect of any order of the court); Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 630-31 (1962) (courts have the inherent authority to dismiss claims for lack of prosecution); Mingo v. Sugar Cane Growers Co-op, 864 F.2d 101, 102 (11th Cir. 1989); Goforth v. Owens, 766 F.2d 1533 (11th Cir. 1985).

SO REPORTED AND RECOMMENDED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

BUTLER v. SMITH
(Mar 3, 2008)