AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

WATERMARK SOLID SURFACE, INC., Plaintiff, v. STA-CARE, INC. Defendant.

ORDER

ROBERT ECHOLS, District Judge

Pending before the Court is Defendant's "Motion to Strike Application for Mandatory Injunction and Restraining Order" (Docket Entry No. 34). That Motion seeks to strike Plaintiff's two-paragraph "Second Application for Mandatory Injunction and First Application for Restraining Order" (Docket Entry No. 33) which purports to incorporate earlier filings as a basis for the requested injunctive relief.

The Motion to Strike (Docket Entry No. 34) is hereby DENIED since such motions should only be granted "in extraordinary circumstances" and where "the document is redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous and this document has caused some prejudice to the opposing party." Reyes v. Seaton Enter., LLC, 2008 WL 400452 at *6 (E.D. Tenn. 2008). However, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's "Second Application for Mandatory Injunction and First Application for Restraining Order" (Docket Entry No. 33) because the Application fails to set forth the basis for Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(d) relief. The Court has already entered an Order Granting Mandatory Injunction (Docket Entry No. 26) and Plaintiff makes absolutely no effort to show what circumstances, if any, warrant further mandatory injunctive relief.

It is so ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

WATERMARK SOLID SURFACE, INC. v. STA-CARE, INC. (M.D.Tenn. 3-3-2008)
(Mar 3, 2008)