AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Attorney(S)
Judges

In the Matter of JOHN R. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; CHARLES M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 1.) In the Matter of PHILLIP R. ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN'S SERVICES, Respondent; CHARLES M., Appellant. (Proceeding No. 2.)

Ordered that the order of disposition is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the appellant, a "person legally responsible for the child's care" (Family Ct Act § 1042), to vacate the fact-finding order entered upon his default in appearing at the fact-finding hearing, as the record showed that he "willfully refused to appear at the hearing" ( id.; see Matter of Nicholas S., 46 AD3d 830; Matter of W. Children, 256 AD2d 412, 413; Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Margaret D., 221 AD2d 439). Moreover, the appellant failed to set forth a meritorious defense to the allegations in the petition ( see Family Ct Act § 1042).

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

JOHN v. CHARLES
(Mar 4, 2008)