AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Judges

BILL LIETZKE, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

W. WATKINS, District Judge

The Magistrate Judge filed a Recommendation (Doc. # 7) that the case is due to be dismissed prior to service of process under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). No objection has been filed. After an independent review of the record, it is the ORDER, JUDGMENT and DECREE of the Court that:

1. The Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Doc. # 7) is ADOPTED in part and REJECTED in part with respect to res judicata;

2. The following claims are DISMISSED with prejudice: the federal claims against Judge McKinney; the federal claims against Sheriff Marshall in his official capacity; and all claims for criminal prosecution;

3. The following claims are DISMISSED without prejudice: all state law tort claims; and

4. This action is hereby DISMISSED.

An appropriate judgment will be entered.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

LIETZKE v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY
(Mar 3, 2008)