Translate
Text Highlighter

Bookmark

PDF

Share

Report a problem
AMICUS AI
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges
Are you a practicing lawyer?
Enhance your digital presence and reach by creating a Casemine profile.
Upload pleading to use the new AI search
Cites
Cited by
Citation Codes
Equivalent Citations
citation codes
Docket Number
Motions
Judges

JOHN M. TOWNSEND, Plaintiff, v. BROOKS, et al., Defendants.

ORDER

LARRY HICKS, District Judge

Before this Court is Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge (#9) entered on August 20, 2007, recommending granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss/Summary Judgment (#6) filed on November 16, 2005. Plaintiff filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#12) on January 4, 2008, and Defendants filed their Opposition to Plaintiff's Objection to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation on January 23, 2008 (#13), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to the court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#9) entered on November 27, 2007, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#9) entered on November 27, 2007, is adopted and accepted, and Defendant's Motion to Dismiss/Summary Judgment (#6) is GRANTED. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Use AI to get other relevant cases.

Comments

TOWNSEND v. BROOKS
(Mar 4, 2008)