Citation Codes Equivalent Citations citation codes Docket Number Case No. 07-14025-RGM. Acts Bankruptcy — Creditors, The Debtor, And The Estate — Debtor’S Duties And Benefits — Effect Of Discharge See more information ... Smart Summary Please sign up to generate summary. In re: CHARLES VERNON DAWSON and NANCY ALLEN DAWSON, (Chapter 7), Debtors. MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT MAYER, Bankruptcy Judge THIS CASE is before the court on a proposed reaffirmation agreement by and between the debtors and DaimlerChrysler Financial Services, LLC (Docket Entry 13). The debtors are represented by counsel who, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 524(c)(3), may have properly completed Part C of the reaffirmation agreement, by checking the certification that in counsel's opinion the debtors are able to make the required payment in light of the presumption of undue hardship. There is doubt as to whether Part C was properly completed because counsel did not check the appropriate box at the top of page 1 indicating whether a presumption of undue hardship exists and because Part D is not completed. See Official Form 240A. Section 524(c) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a reaffirmation agreement is enforceable only if all of the subsections of § 524(c) are satisfied. One subsection, § 524(c)(2), requires that the debtor receive the disclosures described in § 524(k) before or at the time he signs the reaffirmation agreement. Section 524(k)(6)(A) requires completion of Part D. (The applicability of the presumption of undue hardship turns on the figures provided by the debtor in Part D. See 11 U.S.C. § 524(m)(1).) In this case, Part D, "Debtor's Statement in Support of Reaffirmation Agreement", although signed by the debtors, is not completed. Since § 524(k)(6)(A) was not complied with, § 524(c)(2), which incorporates § 524(k), was not complied with either. Because all of the subsections of § 524(c) were not satisfied, the reaffirmation agreement is not effective.